Reviews into abuse-related deaths or serious harm of children remain focused on changing frontline practice, rather than addressing systemic issues, a report has found. Fourteen years after Professor Eileen Munro called for a shift to a systemic approach to reviews, they continue to focus on what happened, rather than how and why harm to children occurred, said the report. As a result, local child safeguarding practice reviews (LCSPRs) tend to recommend training for practitioners, updates to practice tools and procedural changes, rather than address underlying practice conditions related to harms to children, it added. The report, commissioned by the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel, also found that some practitioners associated the process with blame and that there was sometimes little therapeutic support or follow-up for those taking part in reviews. Read more.
You may also like
‘Immense drop-off’ in support contributing to care leaver deaths in England, review says
Death rate three to four times higher than among general population blamed on isolation of those leaving care Read the full article on this link to The Guardian Share this: Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on...
August 26, 2026
Autism and ADHD care complaints more than triple in five years in England
NHS ombudsman warns of years-long waits and patients paying thousands to go private as demand for services soars Read the full article on this link to The Guardian Share this: Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on...
August 26, 2026
Children and violence
The Children’s Commissioner for England has published a new report on children referred to Prevent – the government’s counter extremism programme. The report is based on analysis of Home Office data and interviews...
August 26, 2026





